Massachusetts’ sweeping move to expand abortion rights up to birth is facing fierce criticism nationwide, with one neonatologist calling it “very disturbing” that life-and-death decisions are being made based on limited prenatal information.
In an interview with Fox News Digital, Dr. Robin Pierucci, a co-chair of the American College of Pediatricians’ Pro-Life Council, said she could not “reconcile” the newly signed law, which she said is ironically named the Prioritizing Patient Access to Care Act.
The bill, signed by Gov. Maura Healey last week, eliminates the state’s previous 24-week gestational limit on abortion, making the deep-blue state the 10th to permit the procedure up to birth. Scheduled to take effect in less than 90 days, the law will allow terminations to be performed based on a physician’s professional judgment.
DEM GOV MAURA HEALEY SIGNS SWEEPING MASSACHUSETTS BILL ALLOWING ABORTIONS UP TO BIRTH
As a doctor who cares for newborns facing serious health complications, Pierucci said that even when a baby’s condition cannot be cured, doctors still have an absolute “obligation to care” and should not simply turn to pregnancy termination.
“If it was really about healthcare, then it would be about protecting both the mom and the baby. And if we’re really about healthcare, it would also be about if there’s a problem that was identified â it will be about removing barriers for helping this baby live well,” she said.
“Voting one off the island because there was a suspected diagnosis is just inconsistent to do no harm.”
BOARD-CERTIFIED OBGYN WARNS NEW MASSACHUSETTS LATE-TERM ABORTION LAW EXPOSES MOTHERS TO DANGER
Pierucci cited several concerns with eliminating gestational limits, including potentially inaccurate prenatal screening results that can mislead parents into considering abortion, advances in medical technology that can help babies born as early as 22 weeks and the ethical dilemmas the law could create for medical professionals.
Parents are increasingly offered pregnancy termination based on prenatal screening tests that can produce misleading or inaccurate results, Pierucci said.
“There’s something called the spectrum of disease, meaning I can’t tell usually from just a picture how much or how little the patient’s going to be affected,” she said. “This thing is going on frequently. It’s very disturbing that we’re making life and death decisions with so little information.”
SURROGATE GIVES BIRTH IN TEXAS TO BABY WITH HEART DEFECT AFTER PARENTS REQUESTED ABORTION
Pierucci warned that screening tests have become routine, but typically provide percentage-based probabilities rather than complete diagnostic certainty. As a result, parents may make irreversible decisions without fully understanding what the test actually indicates or how severely their child could be affected.
As a neonatologist who routinely cares for extremely premature babies born at the edge of viability, typically between 22 and 24 weeks, Pierucci warned that the measure creates an ethical contradiction for do
