The Trump administration is reportedly floating a plan to let some married families with a stay-at-home parent tap federal childcare dollars â a proposal that has triggered a growing fight among conservatives over how far Washington should go to support family life.
The reported proposal would expand eligibility for Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) assistance to some married families in which one spouse works at least 35 hours a week and the other stays home, with the benefit averaging about $9,000 per child annually, according to reports.
The New York Times reported Sept. 5 that the administration was considering the proposal in the context of Vice President JD Vances long-standing advocacy for extending childcare assistance to stay-at-home parents, although a White House official told Fox News Digital that Vance has not pushed this specific proposal.
AMERICAS CHILD CARE CRISIS NEEDS MORE PARENTAL FREEDOM â NOT MORE WASHINGTON CONTROL
“Until the administration officially unveils a policy push, any leaked reporting about potential policy ideas that have been neither fully baked nor released should be regarded as pointless speculation,” said the official.
The Child Care and Development Block Grant was enacted in 1990 under President George H.W. Bush, and the 1996 welfare overhaul under President Bill Clinton amended the program and integrated it with mandatory childcare funding streams that are now commonly known as the Child Care and Development Fund.
In a White House press release posted close to Mother’s Day, Trump touted how his administration is working to “better empower stay-at-home parents.” In May, the Department of Health and Human Services issued new CCDF guidance clarifying states flexibility in how parents can choose among federally permitted childcare providers and services.
Critics of the reported proposal, including some Republican and conservative advocates, have warned that it could increase government oversight and create new concerns involving fraud, benefit cliffs, dependency or incentives around work.
Former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene also labeled the idea as “socialism” in an X video, while conservative radio host Erick Erickson said on X the plan is “welfare for married people,” and allegedly showed a recent pattern of the GOP pivoting toward “Diet Coke of Socialism.” Â
TRUMP FACES RECKONING AS GOP FIGURES LABEL $5K PROMISE A ‘SOCIALIST VOTE-BUYING SCHEME’
“I am old enough to remember a time when Republicans were against government entitlement programs,” said Meghan McCain.
Some conservative figures and advocates have expressed support for the concept, arguing that federal policy should provide greater support to families that choose to have a parent remain home with children.
American Principles Project President Terry Schilling told Fox News Digital that the nuclear family needs to be reconsidered after years of government policies promoting multiple undergraduate and graduate degrees while delaying marriage and homeownership.
“For decades, Washington paid institutions to <a href="https://foxnews.com/media/trump-administrat
