By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Oxford HeraldOxford HeraldOxford Herald
  • Home
  • World
  • Europe
  • USA
  • Middle East
  • Asia
  • General
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Newsroom
  • Opinions
  • Sitemap
Reading: Colorado House advances conversion therapy lawsuit bill; GOP lawmaker calls it slap in the face to SCOTUS
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Oxford HeraldOxford Herald
Font ResizerAa
  • World
  • Travel
  • Science
  • Technology
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Latest

Colorado House advances conversion therapy lawsuit bill; GOP lawmaker calls it slap in the face to SCOTUS

Last updated: April 3, 2026 8:19 am
RNN
6 months ago
Share
Colorado House advances conversion therapy lawsuit bill; GOP lawmaker calls it slap in the face to SCOTUS
SHARE

The Democratic-controlled Colorado House passed a bill Thursday allowing people harmed by conversion therapy to sue therapists, just days after the blocked enforcement of the states ban on the method.

HB26-1322 would establish a pathway for Coloradans to bring civil claims against licensed mental health professionals accused of causing harm through efforts to change a persons sexual orientation or gender identity.

The bill also allows people to seek legal action against the entities that hired and supervised a professional who conducted conversion therapy. The bill now heads to the which is also controlled by Democrats, for consideration.

The measure could open the door to lawsuits years after therapy takes place and expose providers to significant financial liability.

The legislation was advanced just days after the U.S. cannot enforce its conversion therapy ban regarding conversations between therapists and LGBTQ+ minors, arguing the law likely violates the First Amendment by allowing some viewpoints but not others.

In , the court said the law favors one viewpoint by allowing therapists to affirm a minor’s gender identity or sexual orientation, but not help them change it if they want to.

Matt Soper, a Republican in , told Fox News Digital that the new bill pushed by Democrats is a “slap in the face” to the Supreme Court.

“We have a bill thats designed to be a de facto ban on conversion therapy moving forward,” Soper said.

“That just hits at the heartstrings of the average American, that the Supreme Court cant even have a ruling be hot off the press before you have a legislature already pushing to undo what the Supreme Court just ruled,” he continued.

“At the bottom line, theres not even a sense of what the law is or can be from the Supreme Court when you have states that are already working really hard to undermine an 8-1 ruling.

“Americans don’t like it when you have a legislature immediately trying to overturn or undermine the highest court in the land before the printing has even cooled down.”

The sponsors of the bill in the Colorado House, Reps. Alex Valdez and Karen McCormick, released a statement following the high courts ruling, reiterating that conversion therapy is “ineffective and harmful.”

“In Colorado, you belong just the way you are. Now more than ever, we must protect from the harmful practice that is conversion therapy. We vow to keep moving forward to safeguard the rights of the LGBTQ+ community in Colorado,” the lawmakers said.

The Supreme Courts decision stemmed from a lawsuit brought by Kaley Chiles, a licensed Christian therapist, who argued her conversations with youth clients were a form of protected speech.

The Colorado government argued the conversations amounted to professional conduct that the state was allowed to regulate.

The case centered on a law Colorado passed in 2019 banning what the state government described as conversion therapy.

While the 2019 law required that claims against providers be filed within two years, HB26-1322 would remove time limits for legal action, and if the victim has died, their representatives could pursue damages within five years of the individuals death.

Soper criticized the bill for lacking a cap on recoverable damages or a statute of limitations on claims.

“A could actually be liable for their entire life,” he said.

Fox News Digitals Michael Dorgan and Ashley Oliver contributed to this report.

Ravens’ Coach Jesse Minter Dismisses Concern Over Lamar Jacksons OTA Absence
Caitlin Clark’s rise has ‘made Alyssa Thomas life better,’ Christine Brennan says after fist incident
US counterintelligence way behind, post-9/11 record extraordinarily negligent, fmr Trump WH official warns
All hands on deck: The unlikely workforce that can rebuild Americas fleet
AI needs more power: Offices could be the answer
TAGGED:HealthHotlatestLegal
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Artemis II crew describes life aboard Orion spacecraft on historic journey to the moon and back Artemis II crew describes life aboard Orion spacecraft on historic journey to the moon and back
Next Article Why Trumps war speech failed: Declaring victory but still bombing Iran back to the Stone Ages Why Trumps war speech failed: Declaring victory but still bombing Iran back to the Stone Ages
about us

Runway News Network (RNN) is a UK-based digital media group operating multiple independent news platforms across the United Kingdom. We provide structured journalism, press syndication and AI-optimised news distribution for organisations seeking national and regional visibility.

  • Sitemap
  • Advertise

Find Us on Socials

Oxford HeraldOxford Herald
© Runway News Network. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?